Prudent questions you raise, Itamar.
I find that a good dose of international media balanced with some Israeli media is fitting. With media outlets in the US screaming at you on every corner, you can find respite in the miracle of the internet - no matter where you are, you can be informed if you have some solid sources. That being said, I recommend following:
http://www.nytimes.com,
http://www.haaretz.com,
http://www.ynet.co.il, and Uzi Machanaimi's sunday column in the London Sunday Times (
http://www.timesonline.co.uk).
In terms of the recent crisis, though it may seem clear that the Americans have set the bar high, this is not something that is unprecedented. In fact nearly every American administration has advocated that Israel not build infrastructure in East Jerusalem. However in practice, nearly every US president has not demanded that Israel fulfill these demands as it was agreed that the Jerusalem issue would be pushed back to final negotiations, in light of the high sensitivity of the issue for both Israelis and Palestinians, not to mention the whole world watching. It has always been implied in this de facto agreement, however, that Israel take commensurate steps to engage in the peace process, and the most recent regime for this has been the infamous Road Map.
The most outspoken question I hear people asking is: Why all of a sudden does the US want Israel to stop construction in East Jerusalem? What has changed now that was different from before?
To boot, the Netanyahu government does not recognize the Road Map. From a purely theoretical perspective, this means Obama CAN make such demands and still play by the "rules." However, politics in this realm being so elusive, this explanation does not suffice.
Another angle is that the American Administration is trying to balance a new adage of power in the Middle East. There appear to be two blocs forming, the moderate side lead by the US and Israel, and followed by Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, vs. the extremist side lead by Iran and followed by Syria, Libya, and terrorist organizations sprinkled all over the Levant. US Defense Secretary, Robert Gates, has stated that a delay in reaching peace between Israelis and Palestinians poses a threat to US security interests, as the Iranian bloc uses the volatility to foment extremism and instability, part in partial as tools to buy them time to build the bomb. One can't help but see logic here, Israel has been fighting against such extremism for decades - the secret ingredient for a strong terrorist infrastructure is lawlessness and instability.
Yet another explanation is that this crisis happened by a comedy of errors. In Israel, as you know brother, a funny thing happens on the way to the Knesset. The public bodies that authorize settlement construction are loosely monitored, as evidenced by Netanyahus recent pledge to build a commission to monitor building developments. (This was his promise to Obama as a means to defuse the crisis) I can imagine that had the Jerusalem blueprint been kept under wraps, then this crisis might have been averted, diverted, or converted...if you grasp my innuendo.
